Comments on: CERN Refuses to Update Its Safety Report for 4 Years

By: eq

Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:21:53 +0000

There is no proof in telemach and your ontological new fact of nature is in reality your own failure to understand relativity.

]]>

By: Otto E. Rössler

Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:33:15 +0000

hdc’s comment is the brightest for once. He sees that the proof implicit inTelemach that “something” increases the size of electrons is decisive. I never said that this must be string theory. But in view of this new fact of nature, all string theorists ought to rejoice. Why they keep silent is a big mystery.

As to the putative Higgs boson, I aleady gave my comment on Aljazeera and Lifeboat. Professor Higgs is one of the very few persons on the panet who could ask for a conditional stop of the LHC until the proof of danger has been refuted. I herewith repeat my humble pledge to him.

]]>

By: Jason

Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:57:49 +0000

Does Otto have any comment on the discovery of the Higgs? On El Naschie Watch, the commenter “Shrink” asks. We all want to know.

]]>

By: eq

Wed, 04 Jul 2012 11:04:11 +0000

It should be added that extradimensions are not a specialty of stirng theory alone. so if one uses the concepts string theory is not always involved.

So Ottos smoke grenade thrown in order to avoid any deep and serious work on the GM paper failed again.

]]>

By: hdc

Wed, 04 Jul 2012 10:46:30 +0000

“They use assumptions from string theory”

Really?

So far they assume the existence of additional dimensions but these are prerequisites for the formation of hypothetical mini-black holes anyway. In general they do not use string theory, it does not matter how often you try to throw this smoke grenade into the discussion to hide your complete lack of counterarguments.

But in your case the use of assumptions made in string theory is of course justified, isn’t it? GM are not allowed even to think about additional dimensions but Rössler is? Remember that you need this extradimensions as well if you want to have mbhs to become created…yo far you have not shown a concept of mbh formation without this assumption. (In fact you have shown nothing at all, but that is not really new to the reader being familiar with you for years)

]]>

By: Tom Kerwick

Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:30:05 +0000

They seem quite certain they have isolated a signature/footprint or whatever you want to call it. I’ve already passed on my congratulations yesterday. :-)

]]>

By: hdc

Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:27:35 +0000

So far it is not sure whether the found new particle is really the Higgs — but nevertheless: Congratulations to CERN for this great discovery!

]]>

By: Peter Howell

Wed, 04 Jul 2012 09:10:30 +0000

While Roessler and Kerwick are making noise, CERM makes science: the Higgs- Boson has been found! Congratulations to the 10,000 real scientists who are working hard at CERN!

]]>

By: Brandon E Larson

Wed, 04 Jul 2012 01:27:00 +0000

I have already directed Mr. Klien to stop automatic deduction of dues immediately and have recieved no response. I am also waiting for a reversal of the “accidental” double billing of my dues in the past. I refuse to be associated with an organization that gives kooks like Rossler a forum to speak publicly. If you have membership dues automatically deducted, then you need to check your bank statements closely.

]]>

By: hdc

Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:28:30 +0000

Rössler, a person who never delivered at least one line of logical reasoning precise definitions and without non-sequiturs and is surely not a scientist, he is a crackpot or a scaremongering clown.
This is an appropriate characterization of you, Rössler.

]]>