Jun 2, 2011

Press Release:

Posted by in categories: existential risks, particle physics

“Who can prove that my Telemach theorem is false?” (See https://russian.lifeboat.com/blog/2011/05/osama-bin-cern .)

The paper shows that masses, meter sticks and charges suffer a change by Einstein’s gravitational clock-slowdown factor.

The charge non-conservation is the most baffling. It was found independently by György Darvas of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. (See http://www.springerlink.com/content/0020-7748/?k=Darvas.)

Black holes suddenly have new properties (no Hawking radiation, no charge) and urmeter and urkilogram disappear. The theoretical foundations of the currently running LHC experiment are gone. The request for a scientific safety conference made by the Cologne Administrative Court can no longer be ignored.

Three further Tubingen results (in chaos theory, quantum mechanics and cosmology) conspire pushing up the risk: 8 percent probability of earth evaporation in a few years’ time if the experiment is continued.

I am being accused of degrading the memory of the victims of the holocaust if continuing to warn of planetocaust. No one who is Jewish like me thinks so – it is the murdered children whose voice is the strongest on my side.

But my father was a colleague of Kurt Gerstein’s at Tubingen? Yes, a dissident colleague. And I was declared crazy by the state? Yes, for revealing a new university law in the lecture hall. And my wife was dishonorably discharged and our house taken away by the state? Yes because medical professors must not be forced to lie to their patients. And my student was denied his PhD? Yes for having found the first evidence against Hawking radiation.

But then it may be worth trying to disprove the result from Tubingen? This is what I am asking the world for 3 years.

For J.O.R.


Comments — comments are now closed.

  1. Dr. Goulu says:

    The experiments at LHC will show your Telemach theorem is false. Your job is to show EXPERIMENTALLY that it is true.

    By the way, my position is “empirism”, which is quite different from “positivism”.

  2. Eventually you are right. But at the time being, continuing in Einstein’s footsteps seeing 3 new corollaries to his gravitational time dilation T was allowed, was it not?

    We could make a bet whether or not it was right. In addition the new charge-eating behavior of black holes can better explain the empirically generated jets of protons emitted by quasars than traditional theories can. At least professor Blandford did not contradict me so far.

  3. robomoon says:

    LHC could also show this planet gets dead. Some psychology scientists should be informed to quantify the anxieties that should have occurred if all people were sane. It is their job, while we are also afraid about the required funding (like physics researchers got) enacting sufficient mathematical simulations to test the new theory.