Lifeboat Foundation

The Large Hadron Collider experiment at the European Council for Nuclear Research (CERN), the most expensive peaceful experiment of history, has lost its scientific justification after two of its 3 raisons d’etre are gone. Specifically, the two reasons for its design mentioned in the title can no longer be searched for now that the new statistical-mechanical discipline of cryodynamics has demonstrated their nonexistence [1].

The third major reason for the operation of the LHC experiment — the attempt to create artificial miniature black holes and to study their Hawking evaporation — ceased to make scientific sense 3 years ago when two papers implying the non-existence of Hawking radiation were published [2,3].

However, at the same time the probability of a success of the experiment regarding the production of miniature black holes got a large boost. This is a bit embarrassing in view of the fact that this success cannot possibly be detected by the outdated sensors CERN installed [3]. Thus the experiment ceases to be a scientific experiment when started defiantly (as this later happened).

However, would its success (to be made about twice as likely during the present month’s experiments [4]) not represent a major advance even if this success can become manifest only in about 5 years’ time [3]? The answer is a sounding yes: a few scientists will then rejoice. But so not in public and so not for long because shortly thereafter, the planet will be absorbed into a 2-cm black hole. “Panbiocide” is the technical term (C.A. Hilgartner).

But this must be a joke? So far, this danger [3] while going unquoted by CERN remains unfalsified. The whole planet therefore merrily intones “Oh you dear Augustin CERN” to Marx Augustin’s original melody of 1679 [5].

References

[1] O.E. Rossler and F. Kuske, “Cryodynamics — The new second thermodynamics demonstrated numerically,” AIP Conf. Proc. 1389, 959–961 (2011). http://link.aip.org/link/?APCPCS/1389/959/1

[2] O.E. Rossler, “Abraham-solution to Schwarzschild metric implies that CERN miniblack holes pose a planetary risk,” in: Vernetzte Wissenschaften – Crosslinks in Natural and Social Sciences (eds. P.J. Plath and E.C. Hass), pp. 263–270. Berlin: Logos Verlag, July 2008. http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/ottoroesslerminiblackhole.pdf

[3] O.E. Rossler, “A rational and moral and spiritual dilemma,” in: Personal and Spiritual Development in the World of Cultural Diversity, Vol. 5 (eds. G.E. Lasker and K. Hiwaki). Tecumseh: The International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics, July 2008. http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/spiritualottoeroessler.pdf

[4] A. Rydd and M. Ferro-Luzzi, “Experiment’s desiderata,” slide No. 8, http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=1&sess.….fId=144632

[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqqtR-yBKqE&feature=youtu.be
(More cultural: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLdwTtdl2cQ)