My repair of the global constancy of the speed of light c – the loss of which had stopped Einstein from publishing on gravitation for 4 years – has revived Einstein’s early greatest strength.
If c is globally constant, black holes are radically different – nonevaporating – in contradistinction to Hawking. And the by definition superluminal expansion speed of the “Big Bang” is likewise exploded.
Two canonized postulates gone: So it is no wonder that CERN refuses to defend its six years old safety report?
Suppose the young Einstein was indeed stronger: Would it not be worthy to check on this fact, especially so if it could save the planet from a catastrophe?
The world needs a voice capable of defending the older Einstein against the younger one. Anyone able to hit that goal?
Comments are closed.