Toggle light / dark theme

Research reveals a surprising physiological reaction to viewing social bonding

While the participants viewed these images, the researchers recorded their electrocardiographic signals. They measured the heart rate variability during a resting baseline period before the images appeared. They continued to measure it while the participants viewed the images. Finally, they measured it during a recovery period after the images were removed from the screen.

The results contradicted the team’s initial predictions. The data showed a distinct decrease in vagally mediated heart rate variability when participants viewed the bonding images. This physiological shift did not occur when they viewed the control images.

The reduction in variability during the bonding condition indicates a phenomenon known as “vagal withdrawal.” The parasympathetic system reduced its activity, similar to how the body reacts to stress or a demand for attention. This reaction suggests the body was mobilizing rather than relaxing.

How the words people use reveal hidden patterns of personality dysfunction

Is it possible to spot personality dysfunction from someone’s everyday word use? My colleagues and I have conducted research that suggests you can, and often sooner than you might expect.

Whether in a quick text message, a long email, a casual chat with a friend, or a comment online, the words people choose quietly reveal deeper patterns in how they think, feel, and relate to others.

Everyone has personality traits – habitual ways of thinking, feeling and behaving. When these patterns become rigid, intense or disruptive, they can cause ongoing problems with emotions, sense of self and relationships.

Neocortical Chandelier Cells Developmentally Shape Axonal Arbors through Reorganization but Establish Subcellular Synapse Specificity without Refinement

Cortical chandelier cells (ChCs) are one of the most distinct and uniform IN subtypes (Howard et al., 2005; Woodruff et al., 2010). ChC axons exhibit a characteristic geometry with many prominent vertical branches, whose terminals are specialized into strings of synaptic varicosities (cartridges) directly apposed to AISs of PNs (Jones, 1975; Szentagothai, 1975; Somogyi, 1977). Because the AIS is the site of action potential initiation, ChCs can have decisive control over spike generation in a PN ensemble, thereby regulating synchrony and oscillation of network activity (Klausberger et al., 2003; Szabadics et al., 2006; Glickfeld et al., 2009). The striking stereotypy and specificity of this axonal and synaptic organization make ChCs an ideal system to study basic cellular events of IN wiring, such as axonal branching and subcellular synapse targeting. Another advantage is that individual AISs, which can be labeled with AIS-specific markers such as anti-AnkyrinG (AnkG) antibodies, can be unambiguously identified because they are spatially separable from neighboring AISs (Jenkins and Bennett, 2001; Taniguchi et al., 2013).

Study:


Basically, the study is carried out carefully and provides novel insights in the development of neocortical chandelier cells. While the manuscript is well written; both reviewers suggest that authors get help with linguistic editing.

The reviewers also agree that the interpretation that the non-synaptic varicosities may represent early stage branch points is somewhat surprising, considering their abundance at an age at which very little branching occurs. The reviewers ask the authors to expand their discussion considering the following arguments/ideas.

In Fig. 3E, it is shown that on P 28, i.e. close to adulthood and after pruning and remodeling, there are still around 40% off-target varicosities, which, if the single example in Fig. 5B is true and representative, would mean that 40% of all varicosities are non-functional! While it is possible that such varicosities could be the origins of branch points to remodel the axon, it is hard to imagine that ChC remodel 40% of their axon at any given time in adulthood. Please illustrate in a revised manuscript better resolved and uncolored original EM data to really show that these large varicosities do not form any synapses. Furthermore, it would be somewhat surprising that their numbers do not decrease after p21 when most axonal growth is expected to end. What about the possibility that these varicosities are in fact very early stage synaptic boutons that fail to mature/stabilize because the appropriate postsynaptic target is missing? Considering that inhibitory boutons (formed by other interneuron subsets) continue to be formed and lost into adulthood seem to make this option also quite likely.

/* */