Archive for the ‘particle physics’ category: Page 527
Dec 14, 2012
The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (3b)
Posted by Benjamin T. Solomon in categories: cosmology, defense, economics, education, engineering, general relativity, particle physics, physics, scientific freedom, space
To achieve interstellar travel, the Kline Directive instructs us to be bold, to explore what others have not, to seek what others will not, to change what others dare not. To extend the boundaries of our knowledge, to advocate new methods, techniques and research, to sponsor change not status quo, on 5 fronts, Legal Standing, Safety Awareness, Economic Viability, Theoretical-Empirical Relationships, and Technological Feasibility.
In a previous post on Technological Feasibility I had stated that a quick and dirty model shows that we could achieve velocity of light c by 2151 or the late 2150s. See table below.
Year | Velocity (m/s) | % of c |
2200 | 8,419,759,324 | 2808.5% |
2152 | 314,296,410 | 104.8% |
2150 | 274,057,112 | 91.4% |
2125 | 49,443,793 | 16.5% |
2118 | 30,610,299 | 10.2% |
2111 | 18,950,618 | 6.3% |
2100 | 8,920,362 | 3.0% |
2075 | 1,609,360 | 0.5% |
2050 | 290,351 | 0.1% |
2025 | 52,384 | 0.0% |
That is, at the current rate of technological innovation we could as a civilization reach light speed in about 140 years. More importantly we could not even reach anywhere near that within the next 100 years. Our capability would be 6.3% of c.
The Lorentz-Fitzgerald transformation informs us light speed would require an infinite amount of energy (i.e. more than there is in the Universe!), thereby highlighting the weaknesses in these types of technological forecasting methods. But these models still serve a purpose. They provide some guidance as to what is possible and when. The operative word is guidance.
Continue reading “The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (3b)” »
Dec 8, 2012
!! JUST TWO WEEKS !!
Posted by Otto E. Rössler in categories: existential risks, particle physics
Please, Dear CERN:
Stop for just two weeks ahead of schedule and the whole planet will applaud.
Everyone is vaguely aware that there exists a 4 years old new result that totally upsets the properties of black holes – the little monsters that CERN is attempting to produce every day.
CERN’s sensors cannot detect them by design, but the first slow enough specimen to stay inside earth will shrink the latter to 2 cm in a few years’ time. No specialist on the planet contradicts my Telemach theorem, published in the African Journal of Mathematics.
Dec 2, 2012
The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (3a)
Posted by Benjamin T. Solomon in categories: cosmology, defense, education, engineering, general relativity, particle physics, physics, policy, scientific freedom, space
To achieve interstellar travel, the Kline Directive instructs us to be bold, to explore what others have not, to seek what others will not, to change what others dare not. To extend the boundaries of our knowledge, to advocate new methods, techniques and research, to sponsor change not status quo, on 5 fronts, Legal Standing, Safety Awareness, Economic Viability, Theoretical-Empirical Relationships, and Technological Feasibility.
My apologies to my readers for this long break since my last post of Nov 19, 2012. I write the quarterly economic report for a Colorado bank’s Board of Directors. Based on my quarterly reports to the Board, I gave a talk Are We Good Stewards? on the US Economy to about 35 business executives at a TiE Rockies’ Business for Breakfast event. This talk was originally scheduled for Dec 14, but had moved forward to Nov 30 because the original speaker could not make the time commitment for that day. There was a lot to prepare, and I am very glad to say that it was very well received. For my readers who are interested here is the link to a pdf copy of my slides to Are We Good Stewards?
Now back to interstellar physics and the Kline Directive. Let’s recap.
In my last four posts (2c), (2d), (2e) & (2f) I had identified four major errors taught in contemporary physics. First, to be consistent (2c) with Lorentz-Fitzgerald and Special Theory of Relativity, elementary particles contract as their energy increases. This is antithetical to string theories and explains why string theories are becoming more and more complex without discovering new empirically verifiable fundamental laws of Nature.
Continue reading “The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (3a)” »
Tags: Are We Good Stewards?, baking bread model, Business for Breakfast, causality paradoxes, E4DSS, Einstein, Exotic Matter, Expanding Universe, General Theory of Relativity, isoacentric, Lorentz-Fitzgerald, Milky Way, moving garden rake, Special Theory of Relativity, string theories, The Kline Directive, TiE Rockies, US Economy, wave function
Nov 24, 2012
Can anyone Tell me by what Percentage CERN Plans to still Increase its…
Posted by Otto E. Rössler in categories: engineering, existential risks, particle physics
… overall luminosity during the remaining weeks of operation before the 2-year close-down for upgrading?
Thank you very much.
Nov 18, 2012
The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (2e)
Posted by Benjamin T. Solomon in categories: cosmology, defense, engineering, general relativity, particle physics, philosophy, physics, scientific freedom, space
To achieve interstellar travel, the Kline Directive instructs us to be bold, to explore what others have not, to seek what others will not, to change what others dare not. To extend the boundaries of our knowledge, to advocate new methods, techniques and research, to sponsor change not status quo, on 5 fronts, Legal Standing, Safety Awareness, Economic Viability, Theoretical-Empirical Relationships, and Technological Feasibility.
In this post I explain two more mistakes in physics. The first is 55 years old, and should have been caught long ago.
Bondi, in his 1957 paper “Negative mass in General Relativity”, had suggested that mass could be negative and there are surprising results from this possibility. I quote,
“… the positive body will attract the negative one (since all bodies are attracted by it), while the negative body will repel the positive body (since all bodies are repelled by it). If the motion is confined to the line of centers, then one would expect the pair to move off with uniform acceleration …”
Continue reading “The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (2e)” »
Tags: 100 YSS, 2012 100-Year Starship Symposium, Alcubierre, Bondi, Faster Than Light Neutrinos, FTL neutrinos, General Relativity, Harold White, hiding in plain sight, Interstellar Travel, Lorentz-Fitzgerald, NASA’s In-Space Propulsion Program, negative mass, Negative mass in General Relativity, Perpetual Motion Machine, Positive Mass, The Kline Directive
Nov 18, 2012
The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (2d)
Posted by Benjamin T. Solomon in categories: cosmology, defense, education, engineering, general relativity, particle physics, philosophy, physics, policy, space
To achieve interstellar travel, the Kline Directive instructs us to be bold, to explore what others have not, to seek what others will not, to change what others dare not. To extend the boundaries of our knowledge, to advocate new methods, techniques and research, to sponsor change not status quo, on 5 fronts, Legal Standing, Safety Awareness, Economic Viability, Theoretical-Empirical Relationships, and Technological Feasibility.
In this post on technological feasibility, I point to some more mistakes in physics, so that we are aware of the type of mistakes we are making. This I hope will facilitate the changes required of our understanding of the physics of the Universe and thereby speed up the discovery of new physics required for interstellar travel.
The scientific community recognizes two alternative models for force. Note I use the term recognizes because that is how science progresses. This is necessarily different from the concept how Nature operates or Nature’s method of operation. Nature has a method of operating that is consistent with all Nature’s phenomena, known and unknown.
If we are willing to admit, that we don’t know all of Nature’s phenomena — our knowledge is incomplete — then it is only logical that our recognition of Nature’s method of operation is always incomplete. Therefore, scientists propose theories on Nature’s methods, and as science progresses we revise our theories. This leads to the inference that our theories can never be the exact presentation of Nature’s methods, because our knowledge is incomplete. However, we can come close but we can never be sure ‘we got it’.
Continue reading “The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (2d)” »
Tags: a posteriori, a priori, Einstein, exchange of virtual particles, Interstellar Travel, Lorentz-Fitzgerald, mathematical conjectures, Mathematical Construction, Nature’s method of operation, Ni Fields, Non-Inertia Fields, particles expand, Quantum Mechanics, Roger Penrose, spacetime continuum, string theories dead by 2017, String Theory, The Kline Directive, The Standard Model, tidal gravity, virtual particles
Nov 18, 2012
Visualizing the World and its Dangers
Posted by Richard Kane in categories: existential risks, lifeboat, particle physics, rants
I want to start a project of better visualization of the problems we face. We ask children to visualize in school but we all could use it. In the common economic discussions trillion dollar budgets and a million dollars are discussed interchangeability shows lack of visualization. The West is heading for currency collapse but austerity measures in Greece just add to unemployment not debt reduction, why is this so hard to visualize?
One clear way to shore up the US economy is to end foreign bases and end the embargo of Cuba. Boycotts hurt both sides, the Cuban economy is smaller so it hurts them more. The US economy is shaky so at some point embargo’s may be the straw that makes us fall apart.
Nov 11, 2012
The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (2c) … continued
Posted by Benjamin T. Solomon in categories: education, engineering, general relativity, nanotechnology, nuclear energy, particle physics, philosophy, physics, policy, scientific freedom, space
I was about to discuss the third of three concepts, but thought a look back would be appropriate at this time. In my earlier post I had shown that the photon/particle wave function could not be part of the photon/particle as this would violate the empirical Lorentz-Fitzgerald transformations and therefore, Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity. The wave function is only the photon/particle’s disturbance of the spacetime it is in, and therefore explains why photons/particles have wave properties. They don’t. They disturb spacetime like a pebble dropped into a pond. The pond’s ripples are not the pebble.
In the recent findings, Dr. Alberto Peruzzo, University of Bristol (UK) the lead author of the paper and quoting “The measurement apparatus detected strong nonlocality, which certified that the photon behaved simultaneously as a wave and a particle in our experiment, … This represents a strong refutation of models in which the photon is either a wave or a particle.” This is a very important finding and another step in the progress of science towards a better understanding of our Universe.
Those of you who have been following my blog posts will recognize that this is empirical validation using single structure test that shows that both wave and particle properties occur together. What is required next, to be empirically rigorous, is to either confirm or deny that this wave function is a spacetime disturbance. For that we require a dual structure test.
If this wave function is a spacetime disturbance, then Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity is upheld, and we would require a major rethink of quantum physics or the physics of elementary particles. If this wave function is a not spacetime disturbance but part of the particle structure, then there is an empirical exception to the Lorentz-Fitzgerald transformation and we would require a rethink of Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity.
Continue reading “The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (2c) . . . continued” »
Nov 10, 2012
The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (2c)
Posted by Benjamin T. Solomon in categories: defense, education, engineering, general relativity, nanotechnology, particle physics, philosophy, physics, scientific freedom, space
To achieve interstellar travel, the Kline Directive instructs us to be bold, to explore what others have not, to seek what others will not, to change what others dare not. To extend the boundaries of our knowledge, to advocate new methods, techniques and research, to sponsor change not status quo, on 5 fronts, Legal Standing, Safety Awareness, Economic Viability, Theoretical-Empirical Relationships, and Technological Feasibility.
In this post I discuss the second of three concepts, that if implemented should speed up the rate of innovation and discovery so that we can achieve interstellar travel within a time frame of decades, not centuries. Okay, I must remind you that this will probably upset some physicists.
One of the findings of my 12-year study was that gravitational acceleration was independent of the internal structure of a particle, therefore, the elegantly simple formula, g=τc2, for gravitational acceleration. This raised the question, what is the internal structure of a particle? For ‘normal’ matter, the Standard Model suggests that protons and neutrons consist of quarks, or other mass based particles. Electrons and photons are thought to be elementary.
I had a thought, a test for mass as the gravitational source. If ionized matter showed the same gravitational acceleration effects as non-ionized matter, then one could conclude that mass is the source of gravitational acceleration, not quark interaction; because the different ionizations would have different electron mass but the same quark interaction. This would be a difficult test to do correctly because the electric field effects are much greater than gravitational effects.
Continue reading “The Kline Directive: Technological Feasibility (2c)” »
Tags: A. A. Stahlhofen, Einstein, Electromagnetism, envelope like wave function, g=(tau)c^2, g=τc^2, garden rake, gravitational acceleration, gravitational source, How long is a photon?, I. V. Drozdov, Interstellar Travel, ionized matter, nanowire, neutrons, protons, quark interaction, radio antenna, Standard Model, The Kline Directive, wave function