During the study, the engineers used the quantum property to track the electrical activity of the heart muscles and cells.
Category: quantum physics – Page 43
About 100 trillion neutrinos are passing through your body at this very second. The particles are the second most abundant form of matter in the universe (behind light), but they interact very, very rarely. That property makes them ideal objects for studying the fundamentals of quantum mechanics; however, it also complicates measurements.
For example, neutrinos were discovered in the 1950s, but their properties are still obscure. New research, published in Nature by a team including Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) scientists, introduces an experimental technique to constrain the size of the neutrino’s wavepacket.
Imagine measuring a neutrino like finding a needle in a haystack. The particles are so elusive that, previously, researchers didn’t even know where on Earth the haystack was located. Now, they’ve identified the haystack, or, scientifically, the size of the neutrino’s “wavepacket.” This measurement doesn’t say exactly where the neutrino is located or how big it is, but it does constrain what those answers could be.
“Information and the Nature of Reality: From Physics To Metaphysics” by Paul Davies and Niels Henrik Gregersen Book Link: https://amzn.to/41GMVl6 (Affiliate link: If you use this link to buy something, I may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.) Playlist: • Two AI’s Discuss: The Quantum Physics… This collection of essays, “Information and the Nature of Reality,” explores the evolving role of information from physics to metaphysics. It examines how the concept of matter has shifted historically, particularly with advances in quantum physics, and considers materialism’s limitations as a worldview. The texts propose that information may be as fundamental as matter and energy in understanding the universe, investigating its influence on biology, consciousness, and computation. Several contributions consider the theological implications, pondering God as an ultimate source of information and discussing the relationship between divine action and natural processes. Ultimately, the text argues for interdisciplinary dialogue between science, philosophy, and theology to form an adequate theory of the natural world. • Paul Davies and Niels Henrik Gregersen in the introduction introduce the central question of whether information matters in understanding reality, setting the stage for the book’s interdisciplinary exploration. • Ernan McMullin traces the historical evolution of the concept of matter in philosophy and its relationship to physics in his essay. • Philip Clayton in his contribution, Unsolved dilemmas: the concept of matter in the history of philosophy and in contemporary physics, explores the persistent challenges and transformations in understanding matter across philosophical history and modern physics. • Paul Davies in Universe from bit discusses the idea that the universe may fundamentally be based on information. • Seth Lloyd in The computational universe presents the concept of the universe as a vast quantum computer. • Henry Stapp in Minds and values in the quantum universe examines the role of consciousness and values within the framework of quantum mechanics. • John Maynard Smith in The concept of information in biology investigates the application and implications of information concepts within biological systems, particularly in genetics and evolution. • Terrence W. Deacon in What is missing from theories of information? argues that the crucial aspect of information is its inherent reference to something absent. • Bernd-Olaf Küppers in Information and communication in living matter explores the semantic dimensions of information and its fundamental role in biological processes. • Jesper Hoffmeyer in Semiotic freedom: an emerging force proposes a biosemiotic perspective, emphasizing the importance of signs and interpretation in understanding life. • Holmes Rolston, III in Care on Earth: generating informed concern examines the evolutionary basis and significance of caring and concern in the natural world. • Arthur Peacocke in The sciences of complexity: a new theological resource? explores how the sciences of complexity can offer new insights for theological understanding. • Keith Ward in God as the ultimate informational principle posits that God can be understood as the fundamental source and sustainer of information in the universe. • John F. Haught in Information, theology, and the universe explores the relationship between information, theology, and our understanding of the cosmos. • Niels Henrik Gregersen in God, matter, and information: towards a Stoicizing Logos Christology proposes a theological framework that integrates the concepts of God, matter, and information, drawing on Stoic philosophy and Christian theology. #InformationReality #PhysicsMetaphysics #NatureOfReality #QuantumInformation #BiologicalInformation #PhilosophyOfScience #ScienceAndTheology #CosmicInformation #OriginOfLife #UltimateReality #MeaningOfInformation #ComplexSystems #HistoryOfScience #Interdisciplinary #SciencePhilosophy #deepdive #skeptic #podcast #synopsis #books #bookreview #ai #artificialintelligence #booktube #aigenerated #history #alternativehistory #aideepdive #ancientmysteries #hiddenhistory #futurism #videoessay
Is our universe still evolving? Could it be a Baby Universe, part of an endless cycle of cosmic creation and destruction? In this episode, we explore the Hourglass Universe Theory, the possibility of an Anti-Universe, and whether cosmic balance was disrupted by a universal force.
📺 Watch the full video here: 👉 • From Creation to Duality: The Mystery… ](• From Creation to Duality: The Mystery…
Join us as we uncover the scientific mysteries of the cosmos, linking quantum physics, mythology, and cosmology to explore the hidden nature of reality. 🌠✨
🎧 Subscribe to Beyond Truth and journey beyond the limits of knowledge!
Please note: The information shared on this channel does not claim to be absolute truth or supported by scientific evidence. It represents the author’s vision and serves as one of many alternative theories. You are free to believe in it—or not—depending on how closely it resonates with you.
Our goal is to foster open-minded exploration while respecting all individuals. We aim to discuss topics freely, including religious, philosophical, and universal themes, without violating laws or causing offense to anyone’s emotions, religious beliefs, ethnic identity, or gender.
There is a peculiar alchemy woven into the very structure of spacetime, an unseen flux of quantum fluctuations from which the most ephemeral of entities — virtual particle-antiparticle pairs — bubble in and out of existence. The vacuum, so named for its ostensible emptiness, is anything but void. It seethes with quantum activity, a perpetual genesis and annihilation of matter and antimatter that, if properly harnessed, could redefine the very foundations of energy production. Here, we propose a speculative yet theoretically plausible mechanism by which this ceaseless quantum froth might be coerced into yielding usable energy — energy on a scale that would render conventional sources mere curiosities of an earlier epoch.
The quantum vacuum is not merely an absence of matter but rather a dynamical system governed by Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, where transient pairs of particles emerge momentarily before annihilating back into the void. This effect, first mathematically formalized in quantum electrodynamics (QED) by Dirac (1930), finds experimental validation in phenomena such as the Casimir effect, where vacuum fluctuations exert measurable forces between conductive plates (Lamoreaux, 1997, p. 57). If such fluctuations can manifest macroscopically, might they not be engineered into a usable power source?
One tantalizing possibility arises from artificially stabilizing these virtual particles long enough to force matter-antimatter interactions within a controlled environment. Conventional particle-antiparticle annihilation is known to release energy per Einstein’s mass-energy equivalence relation (E=mc²), a principle routinely exploited in positron emission tomography (PET) but never yet on an industrial scale. The key challenge lies in capturing these spontaneous virtual entities before they dissolve, a feat requiring an unprecedented interplay of quantum field manipulation and high-energy containment systems.
A new quantum computing breakthrough has sent shockwaves through the tech world. Researchers at USTC unveiled Zuchongzhi-3, a 105-qubit machine that processes calculations at speeds that dwarf even the most powerful supercomputers. It marks another leap forward in the quest for quantum supremacy, with the team demonstrating computational power orders of magnitude beyond Google’s latest results.
By miniaturizing cold atom trapping with integrated photonics, researchers are making quantum technologies portable. Their photonic chip system replaces traditional free-space optics, offering a path toward highly precise, deployable quantum sensors and computing tools. Bringing Quantum Experime.
Scientists enhance quantum sensing for chemical detection with nanodiamonds in microdroplets.
A new study has integrated nanodiamonds with microfluidic channels to demonstrate quantum sensing for chemical detection.
In The Ouroboros Code, Antonin Tuynman, PhD, delivers a groundbreaking exploration of the ouroboric structure of existence, where science, philosophy, and spirituality converge into a singular, self-referential system of reality. This book is a cerebral deep-dive into the essence of consciousness, artificial intelligence, pancomputationalism, and the paradoxical nature of reality as both the creator and the created—a cosmic ouroboros biting its own tail. What makes The Ouroboros Code truly exceptional is its ability to bridge the gap between technological futurism and esoteric wisdom. It boldly addresses questions such as: Is intelligence an emergent phenomenon or an intrinsic property of the universe? Does AI have the potential to become self-aware, and what are the philosophical implications? How do information theory, consciousness, and quantum mechanics interconnect? Tuynman’s writing is dense yet poetic, rigorous yet deeply intuitive—a must-read for thinkers at the intersection of philosophy, science, and spirituality. This book serves as an intellectual feast for those who have pondered the Simulation Hypothesis, the Omega Point, or the nature of computational reality.
#OuroborosCode #DigitalPhysics #SimulationHypothesis #cybernetics #panpsychism #idealism #consciousness #ontology #SelfSimulation #OmegaPoint #eschatology
Ecstadelic Media Group releases The Ouroboros Code: Reality’s Digital Alchemy Self-Simulation Bridging Science and Spirituality by Antonin Tuynman, PhD as an Audible audiobook in addition to previously released Kindle eBook and paperback (Press Release, Burlingame, CA, USA, February 28, 2025 10.25 PM PST)
Get MagellanTV here: https://try.magellantv.com/arvinash and get an exclusive offer for our viewers: an extended, month-long trial, FREE. MagellanTV has the largest and best collection of Science content anywhere, including Space, Physics, Technology, Nature, Mind and Body, and a growing collection of 4K. This new streaming service has 3,000 great documentaries. Check out our personal recommendation and MagellanTV’s exclusive playlists: https://www.magellantv.com/genres/sci…
Link to book on Amazon: http://t.ly/sMJW
QHT Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.09356.pdf.
Non-technical Explanation: https://jespergrimstrup.org/research/.… 0:00 — Does reductionism end? 2:24 — Why there probably is a final theory 7:00 — Quantum Holonomy theory 12:53 — Surprising implications of QHT Does a final theory exist that can end our reductionist probing into ever shorter distances? Or is there no end to reductionism? There should be an end point because as the object of our measurement gets small enough, the high energies needed to measure it will create a black hole. And no information can get out of a black hole. So there is a limit to measurable reality. We have united seemingly dissimilar forces in the past. For example, the unification of electricity and magnetism, and weak and electromagnetic forces. To continue this reductionism, we want a theory that unifies all known forces. Today we have two overarching theories for forces: Einstein’s Theory of General relativity for gravity, and The standard model for the electromagnetic, weak and strong force. The problem is that the standard model is a quantum field theory, but general relativity is a classical field theory. The two are not compatible. Past attempts for a theory of everything include string theory and loop quantum gravity. But string theory does not produce any falsifiable results. Its mathematics is too flexible. Loop quantum gravity only addresses gravity and not the other forces. Quantum Holonomy Theory or QHT was pioneered by two Danish scientists, physicist Jesper Grimstrup and mathematician Johannes Aastrup. It begins by asking question, how can a theory be immune to further scientific reductions, so that reductionism ends? The presumptive idea is that the simplest way to describe the universe is objects moving around in three dimensional space. The theory is based on the mathematics of empty 3-dimensional space, just space, not even time. So the starting point of QHT is the mathematics of moving stuff around. There are an infinite many ways you can move an arbitrary object between points in space. Any one of these combination of movements from point A to point B, is called a recipe. A recipe for a combination of movements in physics is called a gauge field. A gauge field is the recipe of how to move one particle from point A to point B. Gauge fields are what makes up the forces in the standard model. Since they are recipes of moving things around in space, they represent how things interact with each other, or how forces work. The sum of all mathematical recipes is called the “Configuration space” of these recipes. The key insight in QHT is that the this space has a geometry and stores a lot of information. Geometry means that two different recipes for moving stuff around can be said have a relationship between each other. This is complicated but can be proven mathematically. Grimstrup and Aastrup found is that this geometry results in mathematics that looks almost identical to the mathematics that we already know from quantum field theory – this includes the mathematics of the Standard model. From the geometry you can obtain a a Bott-Dirac operator. The square of this operator gives us the Hamiltonian for both matter particles and force carrying particles. The Hamiltonian represents the formula for all the energy in a system. #QHT #Theoryofeverything Once you have a description of the energies of all the matter and forces in the universe, that’s all you need to need to understand how matter interacts in the universe, and is essentially everything we would need to describe the universe, once all the math is worked out. By simply considering the movements of objects in empty space, all this rich mathematics that appears to resemble the known mathematics of the universe comes out. If QHT is correct, then here are the implications: 1) The universe is quantum because the only way you can describe things moving in empty space is via quantization. 2) Gravity is not quantized, so there is no theory of quantum gravity. 3) No singularities can exist 4) There is no infinite curvature of space-time inside black holes 5) The universe could not have come from nothing, but from a prior universe — a Big Bounce! Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=17…
0:00 — Does reductionism end?
2:24 — Why there probably is a final theory.
7:00 — Quantum Holonomy theory.
12:53 — Surprising implications of QHT
Does a final theory exist that can end our reductionist probing into ever shorter distances? Or is there no end to reductionism? There should be an end point because as the object of our measurement gets small enough, the high energies needed to measure it will create a black hole. And no information can get out of a black hole. So there is a limit to measurable reality.
We have united seemingly dissimilar forces in the past. For example, the unification of electricity and magnetism, and weak and electromagnetic forces. To continue this reductionism, we want a theory that unifies all known forces. Today we have two overarching theories for forces: Einstein’s Theory of General relativity for gravity, and The standard model for the electromagnetic, weak and strong force.
The problem is that the standard model is a quantum field theory, but general relativity is a classical field theory. The two are not compatible.
Past attempts for a theory of everything include string theory and loop quantum gravity. But string theory does not produce any falsifiable results. Its mathematics is too flexible. Loop quantum gravity only addresses gravity and not the other forces.
Quantum Holonomy Theory or QHT was pioneered by two Danish scientists, physicist Jesper Grimstrup and mathematician Johannes Aastrup. It begins by asking question, how can a theory be immune to further scientific reductions, so that reductionism ends?